Sciforma vs PMPeople:Making the Choice between PPM Solutions for Agility and Governance
Introduction: PMPeople and Sciforma, Two Completely Different Approaches to Portfolio ManagementFor organizations that are project-driven and are looking for robust PPM tools, this page compares the features and functions of Sciforma and PMPeople side-by-side. Whether you are managing complex programs with multiple R&D projects or scaling agile teams in different business units, the aim is the same — clarity, control and collaboration. Let’s take a closer look at how each of these tools supports your progress.
Quick Comparison: PMPeople vs Sciforma
| Category | PMPeople | Sciforma |
|---|---|---|
| Best For | Agile, Hybrid, Multi-portfolio PMOs | R&D, Waterfall, Custom PMOs |
| Ease of Use | Modern UI, quick onboarding | Training and configuration required |
| Methodology Support | Agile, Hybrid, Predictive | Waterfall, Hybrid, Stage-Gate |
| Implementation Time | Instant cloud setup, very little IT involvement | Weeks to months depending on complexity of set-up |
| Pricing Model | Transparent per-user SaaS pricing | Custom enterprise pricing économique. |
Category
Best For
PMPeople
Sciforma
Category
Ease of Use
PMPeople
Sciforma
Category
Methodology Support
PMPeople
Sciforma
Category
Implementation Time
PMPeople
Sciforma
Category
Pricing Model
PMPeople
Sciforma
Why PMOs Are Choosing PMPeople Instead of Sciforma
Although Sciforma is a great tool for long-range planning where there are many processes, PMOs have articulated they prefer PMPeople when they:
Effortless Start
Want to implement with little or no onboarding
Agile Fusion
Need flexibility within agile and traditional workflows
Real-Time Insights
Want better dashboards and real-time portfolio roll-ups
Predictable SaaS
Would rather adopt a potentially predictable SaaS pricing model than flexibility in licensing
Feature-by-Feature Breakdown
| Feature | PMPeople | Sciforma |
|---|---|---|
| Portfolio Governance | Role-based access, real-time project updates | Multiple views and webform updates |
| Agile Compatibility | Has built-in sprints, kanban, and role delegation | Does not do agile, but has a lot of hybrid workarounds |
| Collaboration Help | @mentions, sharing files, comment threads | Comment on task and building notification workflows |
| Forecasting & Reporting | AI-powered project status updates, and live dashboards | advanced reporting that requires setup |
| Mobile interface | UI is fully responsive and mobile-friendly | Limited mobile capabilities |
Feature
Portfolio Governance
PMPeople
Sciforma
Feature
Agile Compatibility
PMPeople
Sciforma
Feature
Collaboration Help
PMPeople
Sciforma
Feature
Forecasting & Reporting
PMPeople
Sciforma
Feature
Mobile interface
PMPeople
Sciforma
Which Platform Fits Better?
Choose PMPeople if:
- You are managing agile, hybrid, or cross functional projects
- You want governance and dashboards without a lot of heavy lifting by IT
- You prefer a pricing method that scales with your team
Choose Sciforma if:
- You are managing very structured, traditional portfolios
- Your organization is focused on long-cycle planning and reporting
- You have the resources available to train and configure the tool
What Customers Are Saying
“We evaluated Sciforma, but we opted for PMPeople due to its simplicity, as well as its depth. Our PMO has a central home to manage both agile and predictive projects with no delays to our reporting."– Rina Das, Program Director, EdgeWave Technologies
Final Thoughts: Structured depth compared to agile speed
Sciforma will be helpful for organizations with heavy formalized planning processes what they need is every step followed and documented. Whereas PMPeople enables teams to work fast in an easy countless way, governed, and focused on outcomes.